B63 Some commentators argued that there should be either a requirement or an option to recognise changes in the fair value of investment property in equity, on the grounds that:
(a) the market for property is not liquid enough and market values are uncertain and variable. Investment property is not as liquid as financial instruments and IAS 39 allows an option for available-for-sale investments; [IFRS 9 Financial Instruments eliminated the category of available-for-sale financial assets.]
(b) until performance reporting issues are resolved more generally, it is premature to require recognition of fair value changes in the income statement;
(c) recognition of unrealised gains and losses in the income statement increases volatility and does not enhance transparency, because revaluation changes will blur the assessment of an entity's operating performance. It may also cause a presumption that the unrealised gains are available for distribution as dividends;
(d) recognition in equity is mo
…