Date-stamp loading
Version date: 26 February 2020 - onwards
    Version 1 of 1    

Derecognition of a financial asset (paras. BCZ3.1 - BCZ3.3)

The original IAS 39 [In this Basis for Conclusions, the phrase ‘the original IAS 39’ refers to the Standard issued by the IASB’s predecessor body, the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) in 1999 and revised in 2000.]

BCZ3.1 Under the original IAS 39, several concepts governed when a financial asset should be derecognised. It was not always clear when and in what order to apply those concepts. As a result, the derecognition requirements in the original IAS 39 were not applied consistently in practice.

BCZ3.2 As an example, the original IAS 39 was unclear about the extent to which risks and rewards of a transferred asset should be considered for the purpose of determining whether derecognition is appropriate and how risks and rewards should be assessed. In some cases (eg transfers with total returns swaps or unconditional written put options), the Standard specifically indicated whether derecognition was appropriate, whereas in others (eg credit guarantees) it was u

Comparing proposed amendment...