Skip to main content
Version date: 26 February 2020 - onwards

BCZ9-BCZ11

BCZ9 In determining the principles that should govern the measurement of recoverable amount, IASC considered, as a first step, what an enterprise will do if it discovers that an asset is impaired. IASC concluded that, in such cases, an enterprise will either keep the asset or dispose of it. For example, if an enterprise discovers that the service potential of an asset has decreased:

(a) the enterprise may decide to sell the asset if the net proceeds from the sale would provide a higher return on investment than continuing use in operations; or

(b) the enterprise may decide to keep the asset and use it, even if its service potential is lower than originally expected. Some reasons may be that:

(i) the asset cannot be sold or disposed of immediately;

(ii) the asset can be sold only at a low price;

(iii) the asset’s service potential can still be recovered but only with additional efforts or expenditure; or

(iv) the asset could still be profitable although not to the same extent as expected originally.

IASC concluded that the resulting decision from a rational enterprise is, in substance, an investment decision based on estimated net future cash flows expected from the asset.

BCZ10 IASC then considered which of the following four alternatives for determining the recoverable amount of an asset would best reflect this conclusion: