Skip to main content
Version date: 27 March 2020 - onwards
Version 2 of 2

MAR99 Application guidance (paras. 99.1-99.69) (effective as of 1 January 2023)

This chapter sets out application guidance for backtesting requirements and principles for risk factor modellability under the internal models approach for market risk capital requirements.

Version effective as of 01 Jan 2023

Reflects revisions to internal models approach and updated to take account of the revised implementation date announced on 27 March 2020.

Trading desk-level backtesting

99.1 An additional consideration in specifying the appropriate risk measures and trading outcomes for profit and loss (P&L) attribution test and backtesting arises because the internally modelled risk measurement is generally based on the sensitivity of a static portfolio to instantaneous price shocks. That is, end-of-day trading positions are input into the risk measurement model, which assesses the possible change in the value of this static portfolio due to price and rate movements over the assumed holding period.

99.2 While this is straightforward in theory, in practice it complicates the issue of backtesting. For instance, it is often argued that neither expected shortfall nor value-at-risk measures can be compared against actual trading outcomes, since the actual outcomes will reflect changes in portfolio composition during the holding period. According to this view, the inclusion of fee income together with trading gains and losses resulting from changes in the composition of the portfolio should not be included in the definition of the trading outcome because they do not relate to the risk inherent in the static portfolio that was assumed in constructing the value-at-risk measure.