Skip to main content
Version date: 3 October 2017 - onwards

Question 19 Specific limitations to cost disclosure for eligible counterparties and professional clients [Last update: 3 October 2017]

Art. 24 of MiFID II Art. 50(1) of the MiFID II Delegated Regulation

Which specific limitations to the cost transparency regime may professional clients and eligible counterparties agree on?

Answer 19

Article 50(1) of the MiFID II Delegated Regulation allows - in certain situations described in paragraphs 2 and 3 thereof - for a limited application of some of the detailed requirements set out in Article 50. The more limited application which needs to be agreed by the two parties should however never lead to disapplying the obligations imposed on investment firms pursuant to Article 24(4) MiFID II.

ESMA emphasizes that Article 24(4) MiFID II requires that the information provided to clients, amongst others, includes information on all costs and charges, including information relating to both investment and ancillary services, the financial instrument recommended or marketed to the client and any third-party payments. In addition, the information shall be aggregated and where the client so requests, an itemised breakdown shall be provided. The information about costs and charges shall be provided to the client in good time before the investment service is provided and, where applicable, on a regular basis, at least annually.